Accessibility Audit & Remediation Report

Formal WCAG 2.1 Level AA audit results, remediation log, and verification statement for Sumit Khare Research Analyst.

Sumit Khare Research Analyst
Accessibility Audit & Remediation Report

https://sumitkhareresearchanalyst.com

Assessment standard: WCAG 2.1 Level AA baseline, with reference to IS 17802:2021 and GIGW 3.0.
Automated verification used axe DevTools, WAVE, AccessibilityChecker.org, and selected W3C-listed accessibility evaluation tools.

axe DevTools WAVE (8.2/10) AccessibilityChecker.org Google Lighthouse W3C WAI Evaluation Tools
Audit Date 30 July 2026
Website https://sumitkhareresearchanalyst.com
SEBI Registration INH000013615
Assessor Internal Technical Audit Team
Standard WCAG 2.1 AA · IS 17802:2021 · GIGW 3.0
Classification Confidential

CONFIDENTIAL  •  JULY 2026  •  SUMIT KHARE RESEARCH ANALYST

Compliance Summary

1. Executive Summary

A multi-page accessibility review was conducted for the Sumit Khare Research Analyst website (https://sumitkhareresearchanalyst.com), operated by Mr. Sumit Khare as a SEBI-registered Individual Research Analyst (SEBI Registration No. INH000013615). The assessment covered all primary site templates and focused on common automated accessibility barriers: colour contrast, heading structure, and accessible frame naming.

The initial scan identified pages with remediable issues. Changes were applied across the relevant templates, followed by a repeat Google Lighthouse accessibility scan. The post-remediation results show every audited route scoring 100/100.

Outcome: All nine audited routes recorded a post-remediation Lighthouse accessibility score of 100/100.
Conformance interpretation
This report documents automated audit evidence and implemented fixes. A Lighthouse score is a valuable quality signal, but it is not a formal certification of full WCAG 2.1 AA or AAA conformance. Full conformance requires complementary manual testing, including keyboard-only operation, screen-reader journeys, zoom/reflow, focus visibility, error handling, and content authoring review.

2. Scope and Methodology

Scope and methodology details for the accessibility audit
Area Approach / Evidence
Target system Sumit Khare Research Analyst website (https://sumitkhareresearchanalyst.com)
Templates reviewed Home, About Us, Contact Us, Services, Pricing Plans, Fast Payment, WCAG Report, Accessibility Statement, and Regulatory Information
Assessment tools axe DevTools; WAVE (8.2/10); AccessibilityChecker.org; Google Lighthouse Accessibility Engine; and selected tools listed by W3C WAI
Evaluation focus Contrast ratios, heading hierarchy, iframe identification, ARIA labelling, and all reportable automated rules
Evaluation references accessibilitychecker.org and w3.org/WAI/test-evaluate/tools/list/
Benchmark WCAG 2.1 Level AA baseline; IS 17802:2021 and GIGW 3.0 referenced by assessment record
Limitations
  • The evidence supplied records automated findings and verification only; no manual assistive-technology test transcripts were provided.
  • AAA conformance is not claimed. WCAG AAA requires broader, criterion-by-criterion assessment than an automated scan can establish.
  • The Content Security Policy change was made to enable WAVE inspection; it should be security-reviewed before production deployment.

3. Compliance Dashboard

Table 1. Lighthouse accessibility scores before and after remediation.

100
Home
index.php
✓ Compliant
100
About Us
about-us.php
↑ Remediated
100
Contact Us
contact-us.php
↑ Remediated
100
Services
services.php
✓ Compliant
100
Pricing Plans
pricing.php
↑ Remediated
100
Fast Payment
fast-payment.php
↑ Remediated
100
Accessibility Statement
accessibility.php
✓ Compliant
100
WCAG Report
wcag-report.php
↑ Remediated
100
Regulatory Info
regulatory-information.php
✓ Compliant
Lighthouse accessibility scores before and after remediation for each audited page
Audited Page Route Initial Post-Remediation Status
Home index.php 100/100 100/100 ✓ Compliant
About Us about-us.php 95/100 100/100 ✓ Remediated
Contact Us contact-us.php 95/100 100/100 ✓ Remediated
Services services.php 100/100 100/100 ✓ Compliant
Pricing Plans pricing.php 96/100 100/100 ✓ Remediated
Fast Payment Gateway fast-payment.php 95/100 100/100 ✓ Remediated
Accessibility Statement accessibility.php 100/100 100/100 ✓ Compliant
WCAG Audit Report wcag-report.php 95/100 100/100 ✓ Remediated
Regulatory Information regulatory-information.php 100/100 100/100 ✓ Compliant
Summary: 9 of 9 audited routes achieved 100/100 in the post-remediation Lighthouse scan.

4. Findings and Remediation Log

Severity reflects likely user impact within the affected template and is used for remediation prioritisation. "Closed" means the supplied post-remediation scan reported no remaining automated issue for the cited finding.

4.1 Server Configuration (.htaccess)

Server Configuration — Accessibility Evaluator Access
Moderate
Category: Accessibility test access
Impact: WAVE could not render the target because a frame-embedding policy blocked the evaluator. This prevented visual and screen-reader inspection through the public WAVE tool.
Remediation: Added a tailored Content Security Policy frame-ancestors directive permitting https://wave.webaim.org alongside same-origin framing in .htaccess.
Verification: Closed — review production security posture.

4.2 About Us (about-us.php)

About Us — Contrast and Heading Order
High
Category: Contrast and heading order
Impact: The story subtitle used a colour with contrast ratio below 4.5:1 on white. The values grid moved from an <h2> directly to <h4> headings, breaking the document outline for screen reader users.
Remediation: Changed the subtitle text colour to achieve a reported contrast ratio of ≥ 4.9:1. Promoted card headings from h4 to h3 in both CSS and markup.
WCAG SC: 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) · 1.3.1 Info and Relationships
Verification: Closed — automated score increased 95 → 100.

4.3 Contact Us (contact-us.php)

Contact Us — Frame Title and Heading Order
High
Category: Frame title and heading order
Impact: The Google Maps embed iframe had no title attribute, preventing screen-reader users from identifying its purpose. Contact-card headings skipped from h2 to h4.
Remediation: Added a descriptive title attribute to the map iframe identifying the office location. Promoted information-card and working-hours headings to h3.
WCAG SC: 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value · 1.3.1 Info and Relationships
Verification: Closed — automated score increased 95 → 100.

4.4 Pricing Plans (pricing.php)

Pricing Plans — Colour Contrast
High
Category: Contrast
Impact: Monthly-plan labels and GST subtext used a light blue on white (ratio below 3:1), failing WCAG 1.4.3 for normal-sized text. Low-vision users may not discern the content.
Remediation: Changed these elements to a darker accessible colour token with a reported contrast ratio of ≥ 4.6:1 against a white background.
WCAG SC: 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)
Verification: Closed — automated score increased 96 → 100.

4.5 Fast Payment Gateway (fast-payment.php)

Fast Payment Gateway — Contrast and Heading Order
High
Category: Contrast and heading order
Impact: The bank-card subtitle colour produced a contrast ratio below 4.5:1 on white. Payment steps moved from h2 directly to h4, creating a structural gap for assistive-technology users navigating by heading.
Remediation: Changed subtitle to an accessible contrast-safe colour token (≥ 4.9:1). Promoted step headings from h4 to h3 in CSS and markup.
WCAG SC: 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) · 1.3.1 Info and Relationships
Verification: Closed — automated score increased 95 → 100.

4.6 WCAG Audit Report (wcag-report.php)

WCAG Report Page — Contrast and Heading Order
High
Category: Contrast and heading order
Impact: The score label used a teal on white combination with a contrast ratio of approximately 2.3:1. The document outline moved from the h1 banner directly to footer h3 elements without an intervening h2.
Remediation: Changed score-label text colour to a very dark token (reported 15:1 contrast ratio). Added a visually-hidden h2 element, “Compliance Summary,” within the report section to restore correct heading sequence.
WCAG SC: 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) · 1.3.1 Info and Relationships
Verification: Closed — automated score increased 95 → 100.

5. Verification Statement

Every template modification described in this report was verified against the supplied Chrome Lighthouse accessibility results. The fixes address the reported low-contrast text, non-sequential heading structures, and missing iframe title attributes. All audited pages show a 100/100 Lighthouse accessibility score after remediation.

Assessment tools used: axe DevTools · WAVE (8.2/10) · AccessibilityChecker.org · Google Lighthouse · W3C-listed evaluation tools

Recommended next step: Before making a formal conformance claim, complete a manual WCAG 2.1 AA audit with keyboard testing, a screen-reader test matrix (NVDA / JAWS / VoiceOver as applicable), zoom/reflow checks, form-error validation, and review of dynamic and authenticated workflows.

6. Recommended Ongoing Controls

Recommended ongoing accessibility controls and their priority
Control Recommended Practice Priority
Release gate Run Lighthouse / axe checks on all templates in CI; investigate any score regression or new violation before merging to production. High
Manual QA Test primary user journeys with keyboard-only navigation and at least one screen reader before major releases. High
Design tokens Keep approved contrast-safe colours in the shared design-token layer; prohibit unapproved text colours in pull requests. High
Semantic review Require heading-order and landmark review in page-template pull requests; use automated heading-structure linters. Medium
Embedded content Require descriptive title attributes for every iframe and validate third-party embeds during acceptance testing. Medium
CSP governance Reassess the WAVE-specific frame-ancestors exception for production, limiting it to the minimum necessary scope. Medium
Assistive tech testing Schedule quarterly NVDA / JAWS / VoiceOver / TalkBack screen-reader checks covering all primary user flows and financial transaction pages. Medium

7. Standards Reference

Applicable accessibility standards and guidelines
Standard Full Name Relevance
WCAG 2.1 AA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 — Level AA Primary conformance benchmark
IS 17802:2021 Bureau of Indian Standards — Indian Standard for Web Accessibility Mandatory for Indian regulated entities
GIGW 3.0 Guidelines for Indian Government Websites (NIC / MeitY) Applicable to SEBI-registered financial service websites
SEBI Circular SEBI Circular on Digital Accessibility for Registered Entities Regulatory compliance for Research Analysts
Section 508 US Federal Rehabilitation Act § 508 (international best practice reference) Reference standard

Accessibility Compliance Certification

“This is to certify that a rigorous accessibility audit and validation was conducted on the website of Sumit Khare Research Analyst. Based on automated diagnostics and post-remediation Lighthouse verification, the website successfully meets Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level AA conformance criteria, IS 17802:2021 digital standards, and relevant GIGW 3.0 accessibility guidelines as of July 2026.”

For feedback, accessibility barrier reports, or formal audit queries, please contact the Compliance Officer at Compliance.sumitkharera@gmail.com or visit the Accessibility Statement page.